Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-15 00:42:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8EB5360B2DDDF40DBF562009F5EDEF359CDD528F274757176A1C8680815194C
Participant Details

Original Note:

El tweet cuestiona el trabajo hecho por un juez de instrucción.Incluye especulación sobre la calidad del trabajo realizado (que se han ignorado hechos) sin dar argumentos o análisis. Confunde un auto de instrucción con una sentencia, ya que este auto no declara culpabilidad. https://dpej.rae.es/lema/juez-de-la-instrucci%C3%B3n

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1878812358379786732
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8EB5360B2DDDF40DBF562009F5EDEF359CDD528F274757176A1C8680815194C
  • createdAtMillis - 1736901772847
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1878812358379786732C8EB5360B2DDDF40DBF562009F5EDEF359CDD528F274757176A1C8680815194C