Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 00:59:05 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: EEAF7118CB6143A509A71132F2687097D02C06C2525FBAEB9DC4ADB49E7A6CED
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details