Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 10:09:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: ECC1223928EC1D0B294975F5F27207AA4E4D4B7E054C06B6B1DFED9F052499F2
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details