Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 00:56:12 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: EAF21EEF7F5BE93E1E1DDB977B423C9A67F5D8262CF83DA158ADE83F116DCB8D
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details