Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-14 01:05:17 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E17FEB89B189399E09FB3059B047C8B4BA8F0849B1F628ECA840A9A021155296
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details