Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 06:15:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D8EEFB59D32AA4DFB7FAC614DA4841C5A624D64795E0DF04D9E8BFC82E7C576A
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details