Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 03:13:12 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: CDD2C7BD2922268A5032CCBE0DBAF280C36257D39A9CB49140206141B3E3276D
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details