Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 00:48:13 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C1CCD191FD60C804CC882BDF70E13D3C410C0810FD23B17E3A403F1163FD544C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details