Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 00:02:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: BEFC7994F98B91D89F92A7E24B40AFA942DAF212A4150E2668D6FB4ABF946091
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details