Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 18:17:10 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B63983FE4FF614B564395AE1B04445C1F8F1CF7097E4DF5A1C53EE4DF9FD45E7
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details