Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-14 19:13:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B43B0910668E4BBA6D7F50676437FE316B7551544B464DC4D99C8782704447D6
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details