Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 01:42:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: AB9EFD55D30A4BDD8D87C0FFFB1A78CE87B1B94962766859FA75C19AB1B204D8
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details