Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 09:59:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: AA48E051CD66933A2A25EBD6E1768A22EF4509DE85F79CEE612382C410648A96
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details