Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-14 10:53:55 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: A63A0A8C825AE96D7424D421D3A53EB6684AF9608B4AA5BC2B0DB374EF55E392
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details