Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 10:56:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 9E5511FAE15934D29F2301094FC609BAE2CB067B0B35CD14D6B3D5CAF120506B
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details