Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 01:06:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 8C4B63E4C4DB1238BBE41E54E2E709EE7522B131ABD876177B447F6DB425A417
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details