Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 00:18:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6C9EA5EE80FCA2AF898008880901A6FBEAB6989AA80DD842EACBDA0EE14E8895
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details