Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 01:53:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6BDC95E7266500AA8D0134EE35E02D4E2726082EA35DD9FD2CA4E42024AA730C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details