Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 10:25:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 575E1B870E3626C9F33EDE00A9C789D934980F7A1785BF5029A320AE238BC70C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details