Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 00:03:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 47317D9F695A7D1B1EA918FD13A224A0BEB4E1E8C60AC7720A1027529ABF19B7
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details