Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-14 12:17:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 2B3BBF74C50230678BD338DF3698D1CBFDD2D1988BCA2A7494D80E645D52F560
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details