Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 10:55:27 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 2A9EBFCB29B64D2A1B779EB18A6349D32DA112FFA10B05E24FEFC1BE941E6DF2
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details