Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-14 18:16:40 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 295AF28EB6499C2573590745468F6043D9C229035B8A16648384BB414163FE9E
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details