Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-14 08:34:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 2822155497F1C99B35A6B47F678807E0C7D58751D540ED41C3D9245EB69F1123
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details