Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 01:17:37 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 1EB0DB26E50637E5FC1A82A6B35B59EB1B0C0E1ED30D0392E34E82116FD12D7E
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details