Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-12 23:28:03 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 1C2525F315CD11AFE339785C250BB9327D9279E3175E972B596432D75139996C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details