Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 00:45:25 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0CD349BD32665CDC698A79D79E65A43B9CD45A48D6BB36937E3D01EF74AB5E89
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details