Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 14:27:06 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0BD1437397C3094C2B5674BE34B6D0BA9577F4A08D4B58F9232D8032233A5A24
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details