Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-13 06:33:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 00C27C0A59616A6EFAE8E735353C940B558C6818EC34430C2B6AB6A176ECF82E
Participant Details
Original Note:
Missing context: “[The appeal judges] said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed the offences had to be taken into account. If he had been sentenced shortly after committing the buggery offence, he would have been 14, with no previous convictions.” https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/mar/17/peer-nazir-ahmeds-jail-term-for-1970s-sexual-assault-cut-by-three-years
All Note Details