Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-17 13:57:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A207E0B5354371D203E1D893F3E3D596A152105FD4DDC01BB31FB8A442FC4C9B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - First, OP is expressing an opinion. Second, OP does not state Pierre Poilievre's position so offering a "correction" about it is unnecessary.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1878549675860529548
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A207E0B5354371D203E1D893F3E3D596A152105FD4DDC01BB31FB8A442FC4C9B
  • createdAtMillis - 1737122239770
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1878549675860529548A207E0B5354371D203E1D893F3E3D596A152105FD4DDC01BB31FB8A442FC4C9B