Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-13 00:37:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C7E9A7D73708D8B4286D698BB57E7E5E6EE71CD9041CA0753061DF4C390432C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post and reply claims The Times article had “no mention of its [Moncrieff’s 2022 study] deep methodological flaws”. False. There are 10 paragraphs about it (the Jauhar et al “leaky umbrella” rebuttal, directly quoting Jauhar) and other psychiatrists’ counterpoints. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/society/article/do-antidepressants-work-british-professor-depression-medication-ld28kgvj5

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1878512442151424389
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C7E9A7D73708D8B4286D698BB57E7E5E6EE71CD9041CA0753061DF4C390432C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1736728635121
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1878512442151424389C7E9A7D73708D8B4286D698BB57E7E5E6EE71CD9041CA0753061DF4C390432C1