Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-12 19:50:22 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFEC8DEFC10311892B6D46301ED0C033C72860A3B9755FD47853C1F67DDE6E44
Participant Details

Original Note:

The amendment on the motion for a second reading of the bill was to block the bill, which included important protections for children. It only mentioned the need for an inquiry it would not have set one up. https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2025-01-08/debates/656F7D15-EA9D-46EA-8D8A-795738402CE9/Children%E2%80%99SWellbeingAndSchoolsBill

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1878437216210255874
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFEC8DEFC10311892B6D46301ED0C033C72860A3B9755FD47853C1F67DDE6E44
  • createdAtMillis - 1736711422718
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1878437216210255874EFEC8DEFC10311892B6D46301ED0C033C72860A3B9755FD47853C1F67DDE6E44