Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-12 16:56:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CD73B2CA54F2502F1345E824F5D4C0BEDA0EAF22A6C02D66E53070CD0AF150D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The amendment on the motion for a second reading of the bill was to block the bill, which included important protections for children. It only mentioned the need for an inquiry it would not have set one up. https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2025-01-08/debates/656F7D15-EA9D-46EA-8D8A-795738402CE9/Children%E2%80%99SWellbeingAndSchoolsBill

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1878437216210255874
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CD73B2CA54F2502F1345E824F5D4C0BEDA0EAF22A6C02D66E53070CD0AF150D1
  • createdAtMillis - 1736701011151
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1878437216210255874CD73B2CA54F2502F1345E824F5D4C0BEDA0EAF22A6C02D66E53070CD0AF150D1