Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-12 21:22:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 986780EBFAE8664F8B430F8A1DC5CCF3F3D6FD4BF10238C4109647BB272B39ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

The amendment on the motion for a second reading of the bill was to block the bill, which included important protections for children. It only mentioned the need for an inquiry it would not have set one up. https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2025-01-08/debates/656F7D15-EA9D-46EA-8D8A-795738402CE9/Children%E2%80%99SWellbeingAndSchoolsBill

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1878437216210255874
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 986780EBFAE8664F8B430F8A1DC5CCF3F3D6FD4BF10238C4109647BB272B39ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1736716955825
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1878437216210255874986780EBFAE8664F8B430F8A1DC5CCF3F3D6FD4BF10238C4109647BB272B39ED