Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-12 18:14:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2EE6D81EDE6AD755A2A7497FA65D8DC92C8E9A0D7AF774B741EC86C0E44B8222
Participant Details

Original Note:

The amendment on the motion for a second reading of the bill was to block the bill, which included important protections for children. It only mentioned the need for an inquiry it would not have set one up. https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2025-01-08/debates/656F7D15-EA9D-46EA-8D8A-795738402CE9/Children%E2%80%99SWellbeingAndSchoolsBill

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1878437216210255874
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2EE6D81EDE6AD755A2A7497FA65D8DC92C8E9A0D7AF774B741EC86C0E44B8222
  • createdAtMillis - 1736705683869
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18784372162102558742EE6D81EDE6AD755A2A7497FA65D8DC92C8E9A0D7AF774B741EC86C0E44B8222