Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-12 23:27:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0FA34B7C4B9B7C849C4EB3C593E2BC6A19AE226BAFA2CA59038727E73CBCB32D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The amendment on the motion for a second reading of the bill was to block the bill, which included important protections for children. It only mentioned the need for an inquiry it would not have set one up. https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2025-01-08/debates/656F7D15-EA9D-46EA-8D8A-795738402CE9/Children%E2%80%99SWellbeingAndSchoolsBill

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1878437216210255874
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0FA34B7C4B9B7C849C4EB3C593E2BC6A19AE226BAFA2CA59038727E73CBCB32D
  • createdAtMillis - 1736724428870
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18784372162102558740FA34B7C4B9B7C849C4EB3C593E2BC6A19AE226BAFA2CA59038727E73CBCB32D