Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-11 20:13:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0C3BE1A708F4399658494B745D736750AE6CD2F32476890C10BE488BDC5D4F8
Participant Details

Original Note:

While there was evidence that justified the annulment in the eyes of the Romanian court, this evidence was not shared openly with the public, contributing to a lack of transparency in the process.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1878134144871391360
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0C3BE1A708F4399658494B745D736750AE6CD2F32476890C10BE488BDC5D4F8
  • createdAtMillis - 1736626393519
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1878134144871391360F0C3BE1A708F4399658494B745D736750AE6CD2F32476890C10BE488BDC5D4F8