Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-12 20:51:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 67928DB95EE58B46340878F440546F6020A3A15DF7B174EA178D4FC5F38E305D
Participant Details

Original Note:

While there was evidence that justified the annulment in the eyes of the Romanian court, this evidence was not shared openly with the public, contributing to a lack of transparency in the process.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1878134144871391360
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 67928DB95EE58B46340878F440546F6020A3A15DF7B174EA178D4FC5F38E305D
  • createdAtMillis - 1736715081158
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187813414487139136067928DB95EE58B46340878F440546F6020A3A15DF7B174EA178D4FC5F38E305D