Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-11 09:50:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4234AF9547B4F0239518EFCC3E269D846D32554861652EC08256A040DF315F86
Participant Details

Original Note:

BBC Verify is not conclusive proof of anything. It has been shown on many occasions to be incorrect in its conclusions, & has been forced to apologise on several occasions. Its credibility is low and it has been shown to be incorrect on many occasions. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/06/08/bbc-verify-becoming-a-tool-for-elite-control-of-discourse/ https://conservativepost.co.uk/who-verifies-bbc-verify-exposing-the-fake-news-of-the-fact-checkers/ https://youtu.be/J2ZOfDS0-4Q?si=Um-xd5RTaHOQE1X0 https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/has-bbc-verify-done-more-harm-than-good/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877991995727122744
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4234AF9547B4F0239518EFCC3E269D846D32554861652EC08256A040DF315F86
  • createdAtMillis - 1736589009315
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18779919957271227444234AF9547B4F0239518EFCC3E269D846D32554861652EC08256A040DF315F86