Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-10 23:56:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F2DFE44F46BB453BF67C64564270D89E935A7C54C497570D62A11E959358B57F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Context: Given the wind speeds, only prescribed burns would have prevented and they were not done b/c the forest service was not allowed to by NEPA (environmental law). Blaming on water, budget, etc distracts. Wouldn’t change anything. We must focus on reforming NEPA. https://x.com/isaiah_p_taylor/status/1877049594313314525?s=46 https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-9th-circuit/1175742.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877863744434299199
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F2DFE44F46BB453BF67C64564270D89E935A7C54C497570D62A11E959358B57F
  • createdAtMillis - 1736553372999
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1877863744434299199F2DFE44F46BB453BF67C64564270D89E935A7C54C497570D62A11E959358B57F