Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-11 15:40:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E11C9C9F3EAAB8DAEAE75A7BD583E3C28115F8E5DF5EBA766A0CED72E3BD2672
Participant Details

Original Note:

L’exemple montre que le contenu est recommandé selon les centres d’intérêts de l’utilisateur. Il est logique que du contenu lié à Musk soit mis en valeur si l’on suit son profil. C’est le fonctionnement habituel de tous les RS. https://www.blogdumoderateur.com/tout-savoir-sur-algorithmes-reseaux-sociaux/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1877626378444497014
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E11C9C9F3EAAB8DAEAE75A7BD583E3C28115F8E5DF5EBA766A0CED72E3BD2672
createdAtMillis - 1736610052673
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1877626378444497014E11C9C9F3EAAB8DAEAE75A7BD583E3C28115F8E5DF5EBA766A0CED72E3BD2672