Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-10 03:26:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FB82841635C011A4AFA02513C1869F0AA398D87F9C0CB0EB6ACDA398EF3FFCCD
Participant Details

Original Note:

医学論文では現実社会で集められたデータを解析して、そのデータを説明するアイディアの妥当性を検討します。 https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/numa/82/5/82_277/_article/-char/ja/ https://medical.jiji.com/topics/1794 データを見て直観的に感じたことを客観的な手法で確認した結果が論文であるといってもいいでしょう。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877553060177916036
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FB82841635C011A4AFA02513C1869F0AA398D87F9C0CB0EB6ACDA398EF3FFCCD
  • createdAtMillis - 1736479564407
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1877553060177916036FB82841635C011A4AFA02513C1869F0AA398D87F9C0CB0EB6ACDA398EF3FFCCD