Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-11 08:37:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C95D00A87E50D38911EDACA3C4AF5D2CC3730DEA383B7ABCEA6BC8C4543395D4
Participant Details

Original Note:

医学論文では現実社会で集められたデータを解析して、そのデータを説明するアイディアの妥当性を検討します。 https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/numa/82/5/82_277/_article/-char/ja/ https://medical.jiji.com/topics/1794 データを見て直観的に感じたことを客観的な手法で確認した結果が論文であるといってもいいでしょう。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877553060177916036
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C95D00A87E50D38911EDACA3C4AF5D2CC3730DEA383B7ABCEA6BC8C4543395D4
  • createdAtMillis - 1736584670939
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1877553060177916036C95D00A87E50D38911EDACA3C4AF5D2CC3730DEA383B7ABCEA6BC8C4543395D4