Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-10 03:56:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 022666851559CFA3DCD05280CCA1DB0F945BD5E677AA71B6093B96CC8329A641
Participant Details

Original Note:

リンク先の記事に「独自」とありますが、すでに昨年7月に東京新聞が報じています。 https://www.tokyo-np.co.jp/article/340669

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877537288793764232
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 022666851559CFA3DCD05280CCA1DB0F945BD5E677AA71B6093B96CC8329A641
  • createdAtMillis - 1736481385407
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1877537288793764232022666851559CFA3DCD05280CCA1DB0F945BD5E677AA71B6093B96CC8329A641