Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-10 16:21:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BA679C0D3D588666FBB70A827D0AD442796CF5C6A87EE6FCD44892F84694298C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post ignores that significant issues of violation of state law exist with questioned ballots, and that a Federal Judge has ruled that this was a matter for the state supreme court to rule on. https://apnews.com/article/north-carolina-supreme-court-election-appeal-voting-fcbd6d4b592c2ae6cf9a8d291dd1473f

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877528690587824269
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BA679C0D3D588666FBB70A827D0AD442796CF5C6A87EE6FCD44892F84694298C
  • createdAtMillis - 1736526089776
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1877528690587824269BA679C0D3D588666FBB70A827D0AD442796CF5C6A87EE6FCD44892F84694298C