Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-10 00:31:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 38CA91E9D9D947ECACB39E5933C5AA219A87D694689BA98CA78B101E820B329F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The NNN is wrong. Here is the full article for anyone to translate with their preferred tool: https://archive.is/Q7QDN The note and its source are factually correct. Gaz did say that "we have no complainants" and that whatever they have "will not be able to meet the threshold of proof in court."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877486029386514436
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 38CA91E9D9D947ECACB39E5933C5AA219A87D694689BA98CA78B101E820B329F
  • createdAtMillis - 1736469069281
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187748602938651443638CA91E9D9D947ECACB39E5933C5AA219A87D694689BA98CA78B101E820B329F