Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-12 10:01:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 19BBBAD07729CF9632AF5E948C2C3911B3941EC0308C714F109D03B978A7B617
Participant Details

Original Note:

The NNN is wrong. Here is the full article for anyone to translate with their preferred tool: https://archive.is/Q7QDN The note and its source are factually correct. Gaz did say that "we have no complainants" and that whatever they have "will not be able to meet the threshold of proof in court."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877486029386514436
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 19BBBAD07729CF9632AF5E948C2C3911B3941EC0308C714F109D03B978A7B617
  • createdAtMillis - 1736676114065
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187748602938651443619BBBAD07729CF9632AF5E948C2C3911B3941EC0308C714F109D03B978A7B617