Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-09 23:56:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0724B566D593AF6FC419C91B8A00AAAF1BEDEE6585DAC134A47ADBA67729C0B5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The NNN is wrong. Here is the full article for anyone to translate with their preferred tool: https://archive.is/Q7QDN The note and its source are factually correct. Gaz did say that "we have no complainants" and that whatever they have "will not be able to meet the threshold of proof in court."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877486029386514436
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0724B566D593AF6FC419C91B8A00AAAF1BEDEE6585DAC134A47ADBA67729C0B5
  • createdAtMillis - 1736467009892
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18774860293865144360724B566D593AF6FC419C91B8A00AAAF1BEDEE6585DAC134A47ADBA67729C0B5