Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-09 23:31:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00A5C9EBF7FD59793C88C763D13258E21997057AAF27F6160F1A2E9B4892E53D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - OP cites NYP article accurately. He presents the source and even specifies the NYP based their reporting on a lip reader. Nothing in the post is misleading or requires context. https://t.co/6d42kOvm2y

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877480637319491639
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00A5C9EBF7FD59793C88C763D13258E21997057AAF27F6160F1A2E9B4892E53D
  • createdAtMillis - 1736465500490
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187748063731949163900A5C9EBF7FD59793C88C763D13258E21997057AAF27F6160F1A2E9B4892E53D