Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-10 07:08:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A688260056A4BE2CD91D807272EAF21F9668BC37EE30847F25726A83CD501DD2
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. The article linked to appears to back up the point made and noting the supposed track record of BBC Verify by linking to sources with their own agenda doesn’t help.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877444214218469500
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A688260056A4BE2CD91D807272EAF21F9668BC37EE30847F25726A83CD501DD2
  • createdAtMillis - 1736492930315
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1877444214218469500A688260056A4BE2CD91D807272EAF21F9668BC37EE30847F25726A83CD501DD2